|
Major
scientific contributions made by our research group since 1993
include:
1)
The demonstration of the long lifetime of nitrenium ions derived
from metabolites of carcinogenic amines by azide clock methodology.
This finding showed that these ions are sufficiently long-lived in
an aqueous environment to be attacked by biological and other
non-solvent nucleophiles.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
J. Org. Chem. 1998.
2)
The direct spectroscopic observation of nitrenium ions derived from
carcinogenic amines (collaboration with R. A. McClelland). This
work confirmed the results of our trapping studies, and provided
directly measured rate constants for a number of ions.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
1999.
3)
The demonstration that nitrenium ions are responsible for the
formation of the d-G adduct that apparently initiates
carcinogenesis. This work showed for the first time that nitrenium
ions have the requisite chemical properties to be the reactive
intermediates responsible for aromatic amine induced carcinogenesis.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997.
4)
The demonstration that glutathione trapping of nitrenium ions from
carcinogenic amines is inefficient at physiological concentrations.
Glutathione, and other small biological nucleophiles, are not
present in sufficient concentrations in the cell to trap a
significant fraction of the nitrenium ions derived from carcinogenic
amines.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996.
5)
The demonstration that heteroarylnitrenium ions are generated from
metabolites of food-derived heterocyclic amine carcinogens. A second
class of carcinogenic aromatic amines, generated from cooking
protein-containing foods, also produce selective nitrenium ions
after metabolic activation.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002.
6)
The development of a quantitative understanding of the factors that
control nitrenium ion reactivity/selectivity. These ions are
significantly more stabilized by π-interactions than their carbenium
ion analogues.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
J. Org. Chem. 1995,
J. Org. Chem. 1999.
7)
The demonstration of a correlation of nitrenium ion selectivity with
mutagenicty of the corresponding amine. A major factor in
determining the mutagenicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic amines
appears to be the chemical selectivity of the nitrenium ion.
J. Org. Chem. 1999,
Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2002.
8)
The demonstration that the 4-biphenylyloxenium ion has a significant
lifetime in an aqueous environment. Although oxenium ions have been
invoked in many reaction schemes, this is the first demonstration
that a reactive sterically unhindered oxenium ion, albeit one
stabilized by a π-interaction, is sufficiently selective to be
trapped by azide in water.
J. Am. Chem Soc. 2004.
9)
The demonstration that aryloxenium ion chemistry in nucleophilic
solvents is limited by the short lifetimes of many of these species.
Aryloxenium ions not stabilized by π-interactions may be too
unstable to react with non-solvent nucleophiles. Apparent “oxenium
ion” reactions of precursors to these species occur via alternative
mechanisms.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
J. Org. Chem. 2006.
10)
The direct observation and kinetic characterization of an
aryloxenium ion generated by laser flash photolysis.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007.
Undergraduate
Research Opportunities
Since 1979, 55
undergraduate students have performed research in our laboratory for
at least one semester or one summer. Most students have worked in
the laboratory for multiple semesters/summers. Summer support for
undergraduate researchers in our lab can be provided by grant funds,
Miami’s Undergraduate Summer Scholars Program, or other sources
such as the HHMI summer fellowships.
Over 60% of
undergraduate research students in our lab have gone on to earn a
Ph.D, M.D., or D.D.S.. As of early 2008, 37 of these students have
appeared as co-authors on 30 individual peer-reviewed publications,
primarily in the Journal of the American Chemical Society and
the Journal of Organic Chemistry. Some of these publications
are cited in the Recent Publications list on this webpage. Several
more students from this group will appear as co-authors over the
next few years. These students have also been listed as co-authors
on many papers presented at scientific meetings, and some students
have been able to travel to meetings to present their papers.
Current
undergraduate projects in the group include the characterization of
oxenium ion-like reactions of
4-acyloxy-4-alkyl-2,5-cyclohexadienones, the attempted generation
and characterization of 4-alkoxyphenyloxenium ions, and the
photochemical generation of reactive intermediates including oxenium
ions. Additional projects are developed as our research program
evolves. All undergraduate research students in the Novak group are
given responsibility for projects that are separate from, but
related to, those of graduate students in the group. Research work
includes some organic synthesis, but the primary focus of the group
is the study of organic reaction mechanisms using kinetics, trapping
experiments, isotopic labeling, kinetic isotope effects, and similar
experiments. These experiments require students to become proficient
in NMR, mass spectrometry, UV-vis spectroscopy, HPLC, and a number
of other modern spectroscopic and analytical methods.
Interested students can email Professor Novak at
novakm@muohio.edu to discuss opportunities.
Instructional Projects
Organic
Laboratory for Majors, 2nd semester (CHM 255), 2006-2008
This project is
part of a major modification to both semesters of the majors’
laboratory course meant to increase student use of technology and
improve critical thinking skills. For spring 2006 the course
included a traditional component that stressed laboratory skills
development, spectroscopic interpretation, and notebook keeping
(375/500 points) and a critical thinking component that stressed
written communication skills (125/500 points).
The traditional
component consisted of 7 experiments with individually generated
data, limited data sharing, short write-ups (150 points), 2
spectroscopy problem sets, including 2D NMR (COSY, HMQC, HMBC) (55
points), 2 quizzes (70 points), and a two-hour final (100 points).
Tools used in the traditional component included a standard lab
manual, handouts (on Blackboard), an emphasis on keeping accurate
and up-to-date laboratory notebooks, the use of chemical drawing and
molecular mechanics software (ACD Chemsketch, HyperChem Lite), the
use of library searching software (SciFinder Scholar, minimal usage
mostly to look up properties of known compounds), spectroscopy
websites (sdbs
and
NIST webbook), spectroscopy instrumentation (NMR, IR, GC/MS),
and standard laboratory instrumentation. Although this component of
the course would be recognizable to any organic student/instructor
it was organized to make maximum use of modern technology currently
available to organic chemists.
The
writing/critical thinking component consisted of an individual
formal journal-style write-up of one laboratory experiment (40
points), a group literature project (CIITN
(Chemistry is in the News) based) (35 points), and a group
independent laboratory research project (50 points).
The individual
journal-style write-up occurred in the first third of the course. It
was a kinetics experiment involving basic catalysis of a
nucleophilic aromatic substitution. Students generated a shared data
set from individual kinetics experiments. A literature search was
conducted by each student to find appropriate kinetic models for
analysis of the data set. Students were individually responsible for
application of the analysis to the data set and for making
mechanistic conclusions based upon the data analysis. A number of
tools were utilized by the students in this experiment including
NMR, IR, UV-vis spectrophotometry for characterization of reactants
and products and collection of kinetic data, SciFinder Scholar to
find the kinetic models, Plotting and curve-fitting software to
analyze the data, and the LabWrite website/software and ChemSketch
to generate the write-up.
The group
literature project required an analysis of the scientific basis of
news stories in the popular press. Groups consisting of 5 to 6
students were chosen by the Instructor. Topics were chosen by the
student groups with approval of the instructor. Individual students
were responsible for searches of the scientific literature and
annotated bibliographies turned in before the group project was due.
The written analyses turned in by the group included an evaluation
of the scientific validity of conclusions made by popular press
articles. The grade for each student was determined by the quality
of the individual searches and by the quality of the group analyses.
Tools used for the group literature project included the
CIITN website,
LexisNexis News and other news websites, SciFinder Scholar, and
ChemSketch.
For the group
research project, students were given background, leading
references, and guidelines for a research project based on the
Suzuki coupling reaction in the first third of the course. Students
were divided into the same groups that performed the literature
project. Groups prepared a research proposal, including budget ($200
limit per group) about mid-course. Proposals were reviewed by the
instructor and returned for resubmission. After resubmission,
chemicals were purchased by the instructor. The groups performed the
proposed research (12 laboratory hours, last three weeks of course),
and generated a final written, journal-style report. Tools used in
the research project included SciFinder Scholar, NMR, IR,
LabWrite website/software, and ChemSketch.
During both
semesters ChemSketch, HyperChem Lite, SciFinder Scholar software
packages were used frequently, and with increasing sophistication
throughout the year. Spectroscopy websites were utilized frequently,
especially in the 2nd semester. The group literature
assignments allowed the students to develop the ability to read
scientific and popular literature critically, although the
assignments revealed considerable student confusion about what
constituted popular and scientific literature. Student performance
on formal written laboratory assignments improved over time: they
were better able to follow the standard format as they gained
experience. Students did obtain positive results in the Suzuki
coupling project, although they needed more time than was allotted.
As a result, some products were not completely characterized.
Another round of proposal resubmission/evaluation is needed to
improve the proposals.
LabWrite was not significantly utilized by students. It may be
more useful in a non-majors’ lab course. The density of writing
assignments was too high. Students did not have sufficient time to
concentrate adequately on each assignment.
There is a need
to provide time and space for collaborative work. Students avoid
doing this work if in-class time is not provided At least some
students needed help in using technology. They were surprisingly not
very ‘adventurous’ in using software. One needs to emphasize that
these are professional tools, not just instructional aids. Students
need tools to evaluate whether references meet the qualifications of
primary scientific literature. Students are allergic to proofreading
even when using software packages that assist in this endeavor.
| During 2006/2007
fewer formal writing assignments were required. The group literature
projects based on articles in the popular press were dropped.
Although interesting, these projects were not directly related to
the other course material. It was felt that in a lab course with
many writing assignments these literature projects could be dropped.
The 2nd semester research project was expanded to four
weeks with a corresponding decrease in the number of “cookbook”
experiments, and an additional round of proposal
resubmission/evaluation was utilized. The lab format was changed to
1 four-hour meeting (instead of 2 two-hour meetings), with 10
students per section (not 15). The results of the Suzuki Coupling
project performed over the last two years were published in The
Chemical Educator (all
undergraduate students whose data was utilized in the paper were
listed as co-authors). |
 |
|
CHM255 Students
who are co-authors on the Suzuki project paper:
The Chemical Educator 2007,
12, 414-418.
Pictured l - r: Thomas Sullivan, Chris Chan,
Randal Soukup,
TA Yue-Ting Wang, Kristin Goodwin, Jane Oh |
Recent Publications: 1998-2007
(*undergraduate co-author)
45.
“Inhibitory Effect of DNA Structure on the Efficiency of
Reaction of Guanosine Moieties with a Nitrenium Ion”, Novak, M.;
Kennedy, S. A.
Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry
1998, 11, 71-76.
46.
“Synthesis and Characterization of the Food Derived
Carcinogens 2-Hydroxylamino-α-carboline and
2-Hydroxylamino-3-methyl-α-carboline”, Kazerani. S.; Novak,
M.
Journal of Organic Chemistry 1998,
63, 895-897.
47.
“Nitrenium Ions from Food-Derived Heterocyclic Arylamine
Mutagens”, Novak, M.; Xu, L.; Wolf*, R. A.
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1998, 120, 1643-1644.
48.
“Azide and Solvent Trapping of Electrophilic Intermediates
Generated during the Hydrolysis of N-(Sulfonatooxy)-N-acetyl-4-aminostilbene”,
Novak, M.; Kayser, K. J.; Brooks, M. E.
Journal of Organic Chemistry 1998,
63, 5489-5496.
49.
“Hydrolysis Reactions of N-Sulfonatooxy-N-acetyl-1-aminonaphthalene
and N-Sulfonatooxy-N-acetyl-2-aminonaphthalene:
Limited Correlations of Nitrenium Ion Azide/Solvent Selectivities
with Mutagenicities of the Corresponding Amines”, Novak, M.;
VandeWater*, A. J.; Brown*, A. J.; Sanzenbacher*, S. A.; Hunt*, L.
A.; Kolb*, B. A.; Brooks, M. E.
Journal of Organic Chemistry
1999, 64,
6023-6031.
50.
“Correlation of Azide/Solvent Selectivities for Nitrenium
Ions with Ab Initio Hydration Energies: Understanding the
Kinetic Lability of Nitrenium Ions in Aqueous Solution”, Novak, M.;
Lin, J.
Journal of Organic Chemistry 1999,
64, 6032-6040.
51.
“Spectroscopic Characterization by Laser Flash Photolysis of
Electrophilic Intermediates Derived from 4-Aminostilbenes. Stilbene
“Nitrenium” Ions and Quinone Methide Imines”, Bose, R.; Ahmad, A.
R.; Dicks, A. P.; Novak, M.; Kayser, K. J.; McClelland, R. A.
Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2
1999, 1591-1599.
52.
“Characterization of
the 2-(α-Carbolinyl)nitrenium Ion and Its Conjugate Base Produced
during the Decomposition of the Model Carcinogen 2-N-(Pivaloyloxy)-2-amino-α-carboline
in Aqueous Solution”, Novak, M.; Kazerani, S.
Journal of the American Chemical Society
2000, 122, 3606-3616.
53.
“N-Arylnitrenium Ions”, Novak, M; Rajagopal, S. in
Advances in Physical Organic Chemistry,
Vol. 36; Tidwell, T. T.; Richard, J. P. Eds.;
Academic Press: New York, 2001; pp 167-253.
54.
“Kinetics of Hydrolysis of 8-(Arylamino)-2´-deoxyguanosines”,
Novak, M.; Ruenz, M.; Kazerani, S.; Toth, K.; Nguyen, T.-M.;
Heinrich,* B.
Journal of Organic Chemistry 2002,
67, 2303-2308.
55.
“Reactivity and Selectivity of the N-Acetyl-Glu-P-1,
N-Acetyl-Glu-P-2, N-Acetyl-MeIQx, and N-Acetyl-IQx
Nitrenium Ions: Comparison to Carbocyclic N-Arylnitrenium
Ions”, Novak, M.; Toth, K.; Rajagopal, S.; Brooks, M.; Hott*, L.
L.; Moslener*, M.
Journal of the American Chemical Society
2002, 124,
7972-7981.
56.
“Correlations of Nitrenium Ion Selectivities with
Quantitative Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity of the Corresponding
Amines”, Novak, M.; Rajagopal, S.
Chemical Research in Toxicology
2002, 15,
1495-1503.
57.
“Unusual Reactions of the Model Carcinogen N-Acetoxy-N-acetyl-2-amino-α-carboline”,
Novak, M.; Nguyen, T.-M.
Journal of Organic Chemistry 2003,
68, 9875-9881.
58.
“Synthesis and Characterization of the Aqueous Solution
Chemistry of the Food-Derived Carcinogen Model N-Acetoxy-N-(1-methyl-5H-pyrido[4,5-b]indol-3yl)acetamide
and its N-Pivaloyloxy Analogue”, Rajagopal, S.; Brooks, M.
E.; Nguyen, T.-M.; Novak, M.
Tetrahedron 2003, 59,
8003-8010.
59.
“Chemistry of Carcinogenic and Mutagenic Metabolites of
Heterocyclic Aromatic Amines” Novak, M.; Rajagopal, S.;
Xu, L.; Kazerani, S.; Toth, K.; Brooks, M. E.; Nguyen, T.-M.
Journal of Physical Organic Chemistry
2004, 17, 615-624.
60.
“Generation and Trapping of the 4-Biphenylyloxenium Ion by
Water and Azide: Comparisons with the 4-Biphenylylnitrenium Ion”,
Novak, M.; Glover, S. A.
Journal of the American Chemical Society
2004, 126, 7748-7749.
61.
“The Hydrolysis of
4-Acyloxy-4-substituted-2,5-cyclohexadienones: Limitations of
Aryloxenium Ion Chemistry”, Novak, M.; Glover, S. A.
Journal of the American Chemical Society
2005, 127, 8090-8097.
62.
“Computational Study of the Properties of Phenyloxenium Ions:
A Comparison with Phenylnitrenium and Phenylcarbenium Ions”, Glover,
S. A.; Novak, M.
Canadian Journal of Chemistry 2005, 83,
1372-1381.
63.
“4´-Substituted-4-biphenylyloxenium Ions: Reactivity and
Selectivity In Aqueous Solution”, Novak, M.; Poturalski*, M. J.;
Johnson*, W. L.; Jones*, M. P.;
Wang, Y.; Glover, S. A.
Journal of Organic Chemistry 2006,
71, 3778-3785.
64.
“Synthesis and Decomposition of an Ester Derivative of the
Procarcinogen and Promutagen, PhIP,
2-Amino-1-methyl-6-phenyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine:
Unusual Nitrenium Ion Chemistry” Nguyen, T.-M.; Novak, M.
Journal of Organic Chemistry 2007,
72, 4698-4706.
65.
“A Research Project in the Organic Instructional Laboratory
Involving the Suzuki-Miyaura Cross Coupling Reaction Novak, M.;
Wang, Y.-T.; Ambrogio*, M. W.; Chan*, C. A.; Davis*, H. E.;
Goodwin*, K. S.; Hadley*, M. A.; Hall*, C. M.; Herrick*, A. M.;
Ivanov*, A. S.; Mueller*, C. M.; Oh*, J. J.; Soukup*, R. J.;
Sullivan*, T. J.; Todd*, A. M.
The Chemical Educator 2007,
12, 414-418.
66.
“Chemistry of 4-Alkylaryloxenium Ion “Precursors”: Sound and
Fury Signifying Something?” Novak, M.; Brinster*, A. M.; Dickhoff*,
J. N.; Erb*, J. M.; Jones*, M. P.; Leopold*, S. H.; Vollman*, A. T.;
Wang, Y.-T.; Glover, S. A.
Journal of Organic Chemistry 2007,
72, 9954-9962.
67.
“Direct Detection of a Transient Oxenium Ion in Water Generated by
Laser Flash Photolysis” Wang, Y.-T.; Wang, J.; Platz, M. S.; Novak,
M.
Journal of the American Chemical Society
2007, 129, 14566-14567.
|